A line needs to be drawn…

For those of you in favor of sex offender registry, kiss my ass.


Here is a perfect example of why this law is so incredibly flawed:

Could this happen to your child? Your brother? Your friend?

Genarlow Wilson sits in prison despite being a good son, a good athlete and high school student with a 3.2 GPA He never had any criminal trouble. On the day he was to sit for the SAT, at seventeen years old, his life changed forever. He was arrested. In Douglas County he was accused of inappropriate sexual acts at a News Year’s Eve party. A jury acquitted him of the allegation of Rape but convicted him of Aggravated Child Molestation for a voluntary act of oral sex with another teenager. He was 17 and she was 15.

Along with the label “child molester” which would require him throughout his life to be on a sexual offender registry, Genarlow received a sentence of eleven years — a mandatory 10 years in prison and one 1 year on probation.

Strangely, in Georgia two teens can have intercourse and it is a misdemeanor but if they engage in oral sex, it is a felony which mandates a minimum of 10 years in prison. If two teens engaged in heavy petting, that could be felony Child Molestation.

ABC Chief Legal Correspondent Chris Cuomo interviewed Genarlow in prison. Hear from Genarlow yourself and realize the grave injustice of his ten year prison sentence. WATCH ABC’S PRIMETIME LIVE THIS THURSDAY, MARCH 9 at 10pm est.

The January 2006 issue of Atlanta Magazine provides a full account of the grave injustice and problem with Georgia law.


That’s right, kids.

He was 17 and got a blowjob from a 15-year-old.

Now he’s doing 10 years.

And, when he gets out, he has to register for the rest of his life.

I take fucking issue with that.

What makes it worse, people will see him on one of those online sex offender pages and make an assumption.

Look, I take no issue with the neutering of repeated rapists and child molesters. No issue at all. But to put someone’s name and address on the internet after they served their time is stupid. Not because people shouldn’t know, but people, by nature, are retarded. They jump to conclusions and react without checking the facts.

A line needs to be drawn on who registers and who does not. Because something is very wrong with the way it’s (not) working now.

I hope this kid gets out of it.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It does seem a little fucked up to me. Most people I know would be in jail right now under that law. And as for the registry, I am sure the people who enacted it had their hearts in the right place, but as a mom I can tell you I trust NO ONE with my child except my parents. I don’t need some list to tell me who I can trust and who I can’t. I trust no one. Sorry to go all Mama Bear on y’all.


If you ask me, the flaw in this case is not in the registry per se, it’s in the law that makes an underage teen into a “sexual predator” from a consensual act, and the prosecutor who overzealously applied said law to wreck this kid’s life, and/or the parents of the participant if they wanted him charged.

Regardless of the merits of the registry, it’s a poor example for criticizing the registry and a good example for reworking some of the sexual-related laws in America.


Carrie, I completely understand. If I can afford it, I’m hoping to have a stay at home parent (be it me or the wife) when I have kids.

Ace, I could be reading you wrong, but I believe it’s the perfect example on why the registry is fucked up. This is not a unique case. As I’ve mentioned before, I know someone who has to register because of a similar incident. The registry is completely flawed and the argument can very well be made that it is borderline cruel and unusual punishment in many cases.


But the flaw isn’t that we have a registry of sexual predators, it’s who we’re defining as sexual predators under the law. A guy who molests a dozen little kids, his neighbors should know. There should be a registry for sickos like that. A high-school junior whose sophomore girl goes down on him, no, he shouldn’t be in the registry of sickos – but the law under which he was prosecuted defines him as a sicko, and thus puts him in the registry. Not the fault of the registry, the fault of the law under which he was prosecuted (juvenile… Read more »


The old sexual registry. What a conundrum. I think Ace makes a perfect point. Let’s punish those who are actually child molesters and not teenagers doing what teenagers do. Now if a 17 year old forces him/her self on anyone they are a sex offender. Otherwise, common sense says if they attend the same high school, it’s probably just hormones doing thier thing. Like I said No definitely means no, but if it’s two consenting high school kids doing the discovery channel dance, is it a criminal act? I think not. If so, most of us should have been in… Read more »


I think we are argueing semantics, here. You guys are saying we need this law, but need a better definition. I’m saying get rid of the law because the definition of it is the suck. My words: “…this law is so incredibly flawed.” “A line needs to be drawn on who registers and who does not. Because something is very wrong with the way it’s (not) working now.” I see your point, Ace, about what we define as sexual predators, but I believe the registry law is much more flawed because of the fact that the information is so readily… Read more »


The law itself is ridiculous. And I agree with the idea that it could be considered cruel and unusual punishment. Why have a prison system that is “intended” to cure the person and force them to change their ways if you are just going to let them out when they are not cured. The real problem here is not the registry, but our jails. I understand that the turnaround rate for these guys (child molesters) is insane, most who come out from prison go right back to it. That should raise red flags that what we as a society are… Read more »


Registration laws vary by state, as do sex crimes. Laying down a blanket statement that they suck is bad, because in most places, they do not. In backwards, redneck GA, apparently they do not. Luckily, neither me or you live there.